Identification
| Label | T/K? - Turin Provv. 4084 |
| Group/Type | Uncategorized |
| Siglum | None assigned |
| EAT 1 Coffin | - |
| EAT 1 Group | - |
| Major Publications | Ferraris (2011) |
| Owner | ? |
| Provenance | Unknown. Ferraris believes it went through the hands of a dealer rather than came from an excavation, basing his reasoning on some remodelling of the edges of the piece. (Ferraris 2011) |
| Current Location | Museo Egizio, Turin, provisional accession number Provv. 4084 |
Characteristics
| Rows | ? |
| Date Row | ? |
| Columns | ? |
| Pattern | ? |
| Vertical Strip | ? |
| Horizontal Strip | ? |
| Other Text | ? |
| Style | ? |
Schematic
Ferraris provides a description of a schema and has confirmed (in private communication) that this is the layout:
| Xry xpd n sit | sAwy sit | sit | ...ti |
| tpy-a Axwy | Xry xpd n sit | sAwy sit | ... |
Decans
| Ordinary Decans |
|---|
| ...ti |
| sit |
| sAwy sit |
| Xry xpd n sit |
| tpy-a Axwy |
Notes
Ferraris (2011) feels that this table should be grouped as a K table. There is good reason for this in that the decan sit is never spelled sit in the T list: it is always srt. Similarly, Xry xpd n sit is always spelled without the n (Xry xpd srt) in the T list. However, there is a problem in identifying the damaged decan ...ti in either list. Ferraris suggests that the reading could be ...it, which strongly suggests smd srt, a decan which appears before sit in the T list but never appears in K. However, this decan is never spelled smd sit, as it would have to be here.
Ferraris (2011) supports the identification with the K tables by looking at the position of the middle batten, which he indicates is immediately to the right of the first (rightmost) preserved column of star names.